Jyotishya MargaGods · Stories · Living traditions

Graha · Navagraha

Rahu

Rahu: the ascending lunar node, one of the nine grahas of Jyotisha.1

Navagraha — bronze devotional illustration
AI-created devotional illustration · GOD VERSE

Names

The thief at the churning

The Mahabharata’s Astika Parva tells Rahu’s origin within the churning of the ocean. As the gods drank the amrita, the nectar of immortality, a Danava named Rahu drank among them disguised as a god. Surya and Soma, the Sun and Moon, recognised him and told the gods.2

Narayana at once cut off the Danava’s well-adorned head with his discus, but Rahu had already tasted the amrita. The headless trunk fell and rolled on the ground, shaking the earth.2

The epic draws the astronomical conclusion itself. A long-standing quarrel began between Rahu’s head and the Sun and Moon, and to this day the head swallows them during solar and lunar eclipses. The myth is an explanation of eclipses in narrative form.2

Rahu’s chariot and course

The Vishnu Purana gives Rahu a dusky chariot drawn by eight black horses that, once harnessed, stay yoked forever. It also describes his movement. At the parvas, the lunar and solar nodes when eclipses occur, Rahu moves from the Sun to the Moon and back again from the Moon to the Sun.3

This Puranic picture is more abstract than the epic one. Rahu is no longer only a head chasing two enemies but a moving point that meets the luminaries at regular intervals. That idea is close to the astronomical understanding of eclipses as occurring at the nodes of the Moon’s orbit.34

A node in Jyotisha

The notes to Santhanam’s translation of the Brihat Parasara Hora Sastra explain Rahu and Ketu as shadowy nodes of the Moon, always 180 degrees apart. Chapter 3 describes Rahu as smoky in appearance with a bluish body, fearsome, forest-dwelling, windy in temperament and intelligent. It classes both Rahu and Ketu as malefics.4

Head with hands, head alone

Sculptors gave Rahu a recognisable face early on. On LACMA’s lintel from Uttar Pradesh (c. 600–625) Rahu has an oversized ear, bulging eyes and thick eyebrows. His expression is sneering rather than snarling, and the museum finds him more humorous than frightening. His left hand makes a grasping gesture and holds a water vessel.5

The Cleveland Museum of Art’s relief of the 700s shows Rahu as a bodiless head representing the eclipse. The museum explains that he swallows the Moon, which then falls out of his severed neck, the reason an eclipse ends. LACMA’s hands and Cleveland’s bodiless head are two sculptural solutions to the same narrative of a head without a body.6

Sources

  1. Encyclopedia Navagraha — Wikipedia · accessed 2026-11-08
  2. Primary text in translation Translated by Kisari Mohan Ganguli, Mahabharata, Adi Parva (Astika Parva), Section XIX — SriPedia e-books (ibiblio) · Book 1, Astika Parva, section XIX: Rahu drinks the amrita and is beheaded · accessed 2026-11-03
  3. Primary text in translation Translated by Horace Hayman Wilson, Vishnu Purana, Book II, Chapter XII: Description of the Moon — Wisdom Library (online edition of the 1840 translation) · Book II, ch. XII: chariots of the Moon and of the planets; cords binding them to Dhruva · accessed 2026-11-03
  4. Classical Jyotisha text in modern translation Translated by R. Santhanam, Brihat Parasara Hora Sastra, Chapter 3: Planetary Characters and Description — Ranjan Publications (digitised volume 1, Internet Archive) · Vol. 1, ch. 3, approx. vv. 11–30 (verse labels in the digitised text are partly illegible) · accessed 2026-11-03
  5. Collection record Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Lintel with the Nine Planetary Deities — Los Angeles County Museum of Art · Object AC1999.262.1; Uttar Pradesh, c. 600–625; curatorial description · accessed 2026-11-03
  6. Collection record Cleveland Museum of Art, Nine Celestial Bodies (Navagraha) — Cleveland Museum of Art · Object 1971.61; Central India, 700s; sandstone; curatorial description · accessed 2026-11-03

Researched 2026-11-08 from the cited sources. Community corrections are welcome; traditions differ, and differences are shown rather than resolved.